The Growth Model
Once group members reach a multiple of 13 they split into an additional group:
26 becomes 2 groups of 13, plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
39 becomes 3 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
52 becomes 4 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
65 becomes 5 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
78 becomes 6 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
91 becomes 7 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
104 becomes 8 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
117 becomes 9 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
130 becomes 10 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
143 becomes 11 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
156 becomes 12 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level,
169 becomes 13 groups of 13 plus each group has presence in the facilitator level.
The same pattern applies to the facilitator levels, creating the following member numbers for facilitator levels:
Level 0 - 13 members,
Level 1 - 169 members,
Level 2 - 2,197 members,
Level 3 - 28,561 members,
Level 4 - 371,293 members,
Level 5 - 4,826,809 members,
Level 6 - 62,748,517 members,
Level 7 - 815,730,721 members,
Level 8 - 10,604,499,373 members,
This would also work with ‘money’ currency?
Set up a system where everyone forwards £25 or equivalent in currency to the person above (a ponzi scheme like the monetery system we have) but those at the top have to pay back down when they have a set ammount (£125,000 a year, to be comfortable). Everyone above the threshhold keeps paying down to the bottom instead of the other way round?
In this model there is no payment! Also this model has nothing to do with decision making – simply flow of information.
i live in the Bolton area, would like to know more can you help?