STOP RENEWAL OF CORONAVIRUS ACT 2020 - September 2021

  1. to get the first notice out no later than the 10 September 2021 with response due by 17 September 2021,
  2. with the second notice response due by the 21 September 2021, and
  3. the third notice response due by the 24 September 2021...

Simply unless MP’s can show:

  1. SARS-CoV2 has been isolated without contamination by any other organic matter from a sick person,
  2. that it causes unique harm, and
  3. that it is experimentally transmissible from one sick person to a healthy person

Then MP’s voting to renew, or abstain from voting for the renewal of the Coronavirus Act 2020 would be irrational, and hence unlawful...

Also, Parliament has only authorised HM Government to deal specifically with Coronavirus under the CVA2020. Hence any other powers used by HM Government from any other primary legislation is illegal, and Parliament must stop that as they have not authorised it!!!

If you want to volunteer I ask you to do the following:

 

TO PUT YOUR MP ON NOTICE

A - The MP's CAUTION NOTICE

  1. Download the  MPs CAUTION NOTICE.       MP's CAUTION Master template Word format         MP's CAUTION Master template PDF format
  2. Edit as follows:
    1. In the header add your initials in the notice # on page 1 and page 2 (header is different on first page).
    2. In 1) enter the date (must be served before 20 September 2021).
    3. In 3) put your name and address.
    4. In 4) put your email address.
    5. Find your MP's details on https://members.parliament.uk/FindYourMP  and enter your postcode....
    6. In 5) put your MP's name and email address.
    7. In Annex I (page 10):
      1. leave the date blank
      2. Put in your MP's name and email address.
  3. Print the notice.
  4. Sign and date page 9.
  5. Scan the document (or make a clear photo of each page).
  6. Serve by hand or recorded delivery to your MP at their official local office if possible,
  7. and in any event by email as hereafter detailed.

B - SERVING THE FIRST NOTICE - CAUTION (Ideally before 10, but not later than 17 September 2021)

  1. Create a new email
  2. Send to: Enter your MP’s email address
  3. Copy to: Enter the following 2 email addresses: noticespk@protonmail.com and witness2civil@protonmail.com
  4. In subject: MPs CAUTION NOTICE TO VOTE AGAINST RENEWAL OF HM GOVERNMENT POWERS GRANTED BY PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED UNDER THE CORONAVIRUS ACT 2020
  5. COPY AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING NOTICE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Email service in accordance with precedence PT-2018-000160: note of hearing on 01/03/2018, before Chief Master Marsh

Dear [enter your MP’s name here],

I, [enter your name and address], herewith do serve you this notice, with the attached MPs CAUTION NOTICE, in accordance with precedence PT-2018-000160: note of hearing on 01/03/2018, before Chief Master Marsh in respect of the upcoming vote to renew those powers granted by Parliament Assembled to HM Government to deal with coronavirus under the Coronavirus Act 2020.

The precautionary period is now well and truly over, and to date neither the Coronavirus Act 2020, nor any other regulations dealing with SAR-CoV2 have an impact assessment.

Accordingly, should your either vote for,  or abstain from voting in the upcoming renewal of the Coronavirus Act 2020 then you are put to strict proof that you have followed your duty of care, and that your actions are lawful by doing so, and in particular your are required to provide me with that evidence, failing which as you are now with the knowledge contained within this notice.

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies, including but not limited to;

    • Circular arguments that the ‘isolation’ depends upon a test
    • which itself can only be calibrated against an isolated sample
    • as opposed to any computer generated sequence of RNA:
    1. SARS-CoV2 has been isolated from a sick person without contamination by any other substances, and
    2. That SARS-CoV2 causes any unique harm, and
    3. That SARS-CoV2 has been experimentally shown to be transmissible from an infected person to a healthy person.

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies, including but not limited to;

    • circular arguments that the ‘isolation’ depends upon a test which itself can only be calibrated against an isolated sample as opposed to any computer generated sequence of RNA,
    • nor are theoretical computer generated model results scientific,
    • but experimentally verified.

Showing quantified risk reduction are to self and others of HM Government actions relating to:

    1. Socially distancing,
    2. Face coverings,
    3. Isolation,
    4. Lockdowns

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies including but not limited to;

    • Any test method that is not calibrated to a real thing that can be shown to exist (isolated as previously defined)

The accuracy of each testing method used to claim a ‘positive case’ of COVID-19, including but not limited to:

    1. (RT)PCR test,
    2. Lateral flow test.

Further, you are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence in assessing your determination that any emergency exists by applying the false positive rate in accordance with correct science, namely:

    • That the false positive rate is applied to the total number of tests,
    • which are then deducted from the number of positive results,
    • to give the statistical likely positive cases found by the tests in total,
    • meaning it is impossible to determine anything by these testing methods,
    • where by example using official information at the false positive rate is admitted to be unknown [1], and it merely shows assumptions of previous guesstimates from between 2004 and 2019 ranging from 0.8% to 4%, with a median of 2.3%, meaning as at 7 September 2021[2] the UK had:
      1. 7,018,927 ‘total cases’,
      2. 276,466,413 ‘total tests’
      3. At false positive rate of 0.8% = 2,211,731 are false positives, meaning only 4,807,195 possible case..
      4. At median false positive rate of 2.3% = 6,358,727 are false positives, meaning only 660,199 possible cases...
      5. At worst false positive guess of 4% = 11,058,65, are false positives which means there are ZERO POSSIBLE CASES!

 

Should do anything but vote against the renewal of the Coronavirus Act 2020, then you will personally be responsible and liable for your actions, either criminally or civilly or both, for fraudulently allowing the continuation of a non existent emergency, allowing the further destruction of society, for your personal benefit and at the tax payers’ expense, unless you can rebutt my notice.

Regards,

[enter your name]

 

[1] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/895843/S0519_Impact_of_false_positives_and_negatives.pdf

[2] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Attachments: MP’s Caution Notice

6. Insert your MP’s name in this covering notice.

7. Enter your name and address in this covering notice.

8. Sign off with your name.

9. Attach your scanned copy or photos of the notice (Instructions A above).

10. Double check you have followed all the instructions!

then click send!!!

 

C - SERVING THE SECOND NOTICE - WARNING (IF NO MEANINGFUL RESPONSE IS RECEIVED, SEND ON THE 17 September 2021)

  1. Click forward from your sent first notice.
  2. Send to: Enter your MP’s email address
  3. Copy to: Enter the following 2 email addresses: noticespk@protonmail.com and witness2civil@protonmail.com
  4. In subject: MPs WARNING NOTICE TO VOTE AGAINST RENEWAL OF HM GOVERNMENT POWERS GRANTED BY PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED UNDER THE CORONAVIRUS ACT 2020
  5. COPY AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING NOTICE ABOVE THE PREVIOUS NOTICE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Email service in accordance with precedence PT-2018-000160: note of hearing on 01/03/2018, before Chief Master Marsh

Dear [enter your MP’s name here],

You have failed to respond in a meaningful way to show the lawfulness of the Coronavirus Act 2020, and secondary regulations pertaining to Coronavirus as per my below emailed CAUTION NOTICE, and the attached MP's CAUTION NOTICE

I, [enter your name and address], herewith do serve you this WARNING NOTICE, in accordance with precedence PT-2018-000160: note of hearing on 01/03/2018, before Chief Master Marsh in respect of the upcoming vote to renew those powers granted by Parliament Assembled to HM Government to deal with coronavirus under the Coronavirus Act 2020.

I reiterate:

The precautionary period is now well and truly over, and to date neither the Coronavirus Act 2020, nor any other regulations dealing with SAR-CoV2 have an impact assessment.

Accordingly, should your either vote for,  or abstain from voting in the upcoming renewal of the Coronavirus Act 2020 then you are put to strict proof that you have followed your duty of care, and that your actions are lawful by doing so, and in particular your are required to provide me with that evidence, failing which as you are now with the knowledge contained within this notice.

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies, including but not limited to;

    • Circular arguments that the ‘isolation’ depends upon a test
    • which itself can only be calibrated against an isolated sample
    • as opposed to any computer generated sequence of RNA:
    1. SARS-CoV2 has been isolated from a sick person without contamination by any other substances, and
    2. That SARS-CoV2 causes any unique harm, and
    3. That SARS-CoV2 has been experimentally shown to be transmissible from an infected person to a healthy person.

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies, including but not limited to;

    • circular arguments that the ‘isolation’ depends upon a test which itself can only be calibrated against an isolated sample as opposed to any computer generated sequence of RNA,
    • nor are theoretical computer generated model results scientific,
    • but experimentally verified.

Showing quantified risk reduction are to self and others of HM Government actions relating to:

    1. Socially distancing,
    2. Face coverings,
    3. Isolation,
    4. Lockdowns

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies including but not limited to;

    • Any test method that is not calibrated to a real thing that can be shown to exist (isolated as previously defined)

The accuracy of each testing method used to claim a ‘positive case’ of COVID-19, including but not limited to:

    1. (RT)PCR test,
    2. Lateral flow test.

Further, you are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence in assessing your determination that any emergency exists by applying the false positive rate in accordance with correct science, namely:

    • That the false positive rate is applied to the total number of tests,
    • which are then deducted from the number of positive results,
    • to give the statistical likely positive cases found by the tests in total,
    • meaning it is impossible to determine anything by these testing methods,
    • where by example using official information at the false positive rate is admitted to be unknown [1], and it merely shows assumptions of previous guesstimates from between 2004 and 2019 ranging from 0.8% to 4%, with a median of 2.3%, meaning as at 7 September 2021[2] the UK had:
      1. 7,018,927 ‘total cases’,
      2. 276,466,413 ‘total tests’
      3. At false positive rate of 0.8% = 2,211,731 are false positives, meaning only 4,807,195 possible case..
      4. At median false positive rate of 2.3% = 6,358,727 are false positives, meaning only 660,199 possible cases...
      5. At worst false positive guess of 4% = 11,058,65, are false positives which means there are ZERO POSSIBLE CASES!

 

Should do anything but vote against the renewal of the Coronavirus Act 2020, then you will personally be responsible and liable for your actions, either criminally or civilly or both, for fraudulently allowing the continuation of a non existent emergency, allowing the further destruction of society, for your personal benefit and at the tax payers’ expense, unless you can rebutt my notice.

Regards,

[enter your name]

 

[1] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/895843/S0519_Impact_of_false_positives_and_negatives.pdf

[2] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Attachments: MP’s Caution Notice

6. Insert your MP’s name in this covering notice.

7. Enter your name and address in this covering notice.

8. Sign off with your name.

9. MAKE SURE AND IF NECESSARY REATTACH your scanned copy or photos of the notice (Instructions A above).

10. Double check you have followed all the instructions!

then click send!!!

 

D - SERVING THE FINAL NOTICE - LETTER BEFORE ACTION (IF NO MEANINGFUL RESPONSE IS RECEIVED, SEND ON THE 21 September 2021)

  1. Click forward from your sent second notice.
  2. Send to: Enter your MP’s email address
  3. Copy to: Enter the following 2 email addresses: noticespk@protonmail.com and witness2civil@protonmail.com
  4. In subject: MPs LETTER BEFORE ACTION NOTICE TO VOTE AGAINST RENEWAL OF HM GOVERNMENT POWERS GRANTED BY PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED UNDER THE CORONAVIRUS ACT 2020
  5. COPY AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING NOTICE ABOVE THE PREVIOUS NOTICE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Email service in accordance with precedence PT-2018-000160: note of hearing on 01/03/2018, before Chief Master Marsh

Dear [enter your MP’s name here],

You have failed to respond in a meaningful way to show the lawfulness of the Coronavirus Act 2020, and secondary regulations pertaining to Coronavirus as per my below emailed WARNING NOTICE, CAUTION NOTICE, and the attached MP's CAUTION NOTICE

I, [enter your name and address], herewith do serve you this LETTER BEFORE ACTION NOTICE, in accordance with precedence PT-2018-000160: note of hearing on 01/03/2018, before Chief Master Marsh in respect of the upcoming vote to renew those powers granted by Parliament Assembled to HM Government to deal with coronavirus under the Coronavirus Act 2020.

I again reiterate:

The precautionary period is now well and truly over, and to date neither the Coronavirus Act 2020, nor any other regulations dealing with SAR-CoV2 have an impact assessment.

Accordingly, should your either vote for,  or abstain from voting in the upcoming renewal of the Coronavirus Act 2020 then you are put to strict proof that you have followed your duty of care, and that your actions are lawful by doing so, and in particular your are required to provide me with that evidence, failing which as you are now with the knowledge contained within this notice.

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies, including but not limited to;

    • Circular arguments that the ‘isolation’ depends upon a test
    • which itself can only be calibrated against an isolated sample
    • as opposed to any computer generated sequence of RNA:
    1. SARS-CoV2 has been isolated from a sick person without contamination by any other substances, and
    2. That SARS-CoV2 causes any unique harm, and
    3. That SARS-CoV2 has been experimentally shown to be transmissible from an infected person to a healthy person.

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies, including but not limited to;

    • circular arguments that the ‘isolation’ depends upon a test which itself can only be calibrated against an isolated sample as opposed to any computer generated sequence of RNA,
    • nor are theoretical computer generated model results scientific,
    • but experimentally verified.

Showing quantified risk reduction are to self and others of HM Government actions relating to:

    1. Socially distancing,
    2. Face coverings,
    3. Isolation,
    4. Lockdowns

You are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence and I require you to provide scientific evidence that does not follow logical fallacies including but not limited to;

    • Any test method that is not calibrated to a real thing that can be shown to exist (isolated as previously defined)

The accuracy of each testing method used to claim a ‘positive case’ of COVID-19, including but not limited to:

    1. (RT)PCR test,
    2. Lateral flow test.

Further, you are hereby put to strict proof that you have followed your due diligence in assessing your determination that any emergency exists by applying the false positive rate in accordance with correct science, namely:

    • That the false positive rate is applied to the total number of tests,
    • which are then deducted from the number of positive results,
    • to give the statistical likely positive cases found by the tests in total,
    • meaning it is impossible to determine anything by these testing methods,
    • where by example using official information at the false positive rate is admitted to be unknown [1], and it merely shows assumptions of previous guesstimates from between 2004 and 2019 ranging from 0.8% to 4%, with a median of 2.3%, meaning as at 7 September 2021[2] the UK had:
      1. 7,018,927 ‘total cases’,
      2. 276,466,413 ‘total tests’
      3. At false positive rate of 0.8% = 2,211,731 are false positives, meaning only 4,807,195 possible case..
      4. At median false positive rate of 2.3% = 6,358,727 are false positives, meaning only 660,199 possible cases...
      5. At worst false positive guess of 4% = 11,058,65, are false positives which means there are ZERO POSSIBLE CASES!

 

Should do anything but vote against the renewal of the Coronavirus Act 2020, then you will personally be responsible and liable for your actions, either criminally or civilly or both, for fraudulently allowing the continuation of a non existent emergency, allowing the further destruction of society, for your personal benefit and at the tax payers’ expense, unless you can rebutt my notice.

Regards,

[enter your name]

 

[1] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/895843/S0519_Impact_of_false_positives_and_negatives.pdf

[2] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Attachments: MP’s Caution Notice

6. Insert your MP’s name in this covering notice.

7. Enter your name and address in this covering notice.

8. Sign off with your name.

9. MAKE SURE AND IF NECESSARY REATTACH your scanned copy or photos of the notice (Instructions A above).

10. Double check you have followed all the instructions!

then click send!!!

Leave a comment