FULL CONSENT GOVERNANCE MODEL SUMMARY - APRIL 2018
Having Recently rediscovered my earlier works this was after all my rabbit holes 'freeman of the land' and other of nonsense exploratory period for which I cannot find the website anymore!!!
This was my 2017-2018 website Be the Change You Want To See https://peacetreatytomyfellowhumans.wordpress.com/the-basics-of-human-authority-and-social-interaction/
The full context and importance of this model will become apparent in later articles as my research evolved into a full trust model by 2021 in my next website - Unrebutted Claims Stand as Truth which added granular detail to both the contract and trust governance models, largely around the Glorious Revolution 1688 and the Coronation Oath.
This then further evolved to fully understand each model in context by 2025 when I first found the Ashby v White case which affirmed the consent governance model was in place and understood as such which explains why there were 3 sources of law as resolved in the Case of Proclamations 1610, but to fully understand that moved my whole timeline of research back to the 1066 Norman invasion. With the fully developed Trust governance model in place by 2021 the key to unravelling the constitutional difference came in 1832 from which judicial confirmations started to arise confirming this, and ultimately this together affirms there is no 'public law distinction' beyond a complacent judiciary who do not know what their job is!
They say a picture paints a thousand words so the words will follow to give a full comprehension of the pictures.
The Contract Governance Model is a layered constitutional architecture in which legitimacy flows downward from ontological authority and accountability flows upward through responsibility.
Having recently rediscovered my earlier works, this followed a period of exploratory detours including “freeman of the land” material which proved structurally incoherent and historically unsupported.
This model originates in my 2017–2018 website:
Be the Change You Want To See
https://peacetreatytomyfellowhumans.wordpress.com/the-basics-of-human-authority-and-social-interaction/
The importance of this model becomes clearer as later research (2021 onward) developed the trust governance model in parallel, particularly in Unrebutted Claims Stand As Truth, incorporating detailed analysis of the Glorious Revolution 1688 and the Coronation Oath.
By 2025, research into Ashby v White and Case of Proclamations 1610 clarified that the consent governance model had historical recognition, explaining the coexistence of multiple sources of law. This further extended backward to 1066 and forward to the 1832 structural rupture.
This document concerns the Consent Governance Model only, as fully formed in 2017 and structurally expanded in March 2018.
STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW
The Contract (Consent) Governance Model is a layered constitutional architecture in which:
Authority flows downward.
Accountability flows upward.
Justice mediates between governed and governing.
Governance is subordinate to Justice.
Enforcement is subordinate to Justice.
Its structure is:
Tier 1 – Ontological Source
↓
Tier 2 – Human Legal Structure
↓
Tier 3 – Justice Mediation ← Tier 4 – Governance
↓
Tier 5 – Enforcement
TIER 1 – ONTOLOGICAL
Creation
→ Promise 3 of the Coronation Oath
→ Divine Law
→ Moral Law
→ Equal Authority
→ Conscience (March 2018)
Creation
Authority originates in Creation, not in statute.
Promise 3 – Coronation Oath
“Maintain the Laws of God…”
Confirms governance is subordinate to Higher Law.
Divine Law
Represents superior normative order.
Moral Law
Constraint: not to knowingly cause harm.
Equal Authority
All humans derive equal authority from Creation.
Conscience (March 2018)
Inserted explicitly in March 2018.
Conscience becomes the evaluative bridge between ontological authority and human legal systems.
TIER 2 – HUMAN LEGAL STRUCTURE & MECHANISM
Chain:
Law of the Land
→ Equity
→ Rules of Equity Prevail
→ Common Law subject to Equity
→ Common Law
→ Consent
→ Contracts
→ Delegation
→ Liability
Law of the Land
Beliefs, customs, usages, traditions (lex non scripta).
Equity (March 2018)
Conscience-based corrective jurisdiction.
Rules of Equity Prevail
Where conflict exists, equity prevails.
Common Law subject to Equity
Common law is subordinate to conscience under equity.
Common Law
Crystallised custom through judicial reasoning (lex scripta).
Consent
Legitimacy requires voluntary agreement.
Contracts
Meeting of minds formalises consent.
Delegation
Authority is transferred conditionally.
Liability
Excess authority → personal liability.
TIER 3 – JUSTICE MEDIATION
Chain:
Promise 2 – Coronation Oath
→ Public Justice
→ Trial by Jury
→ Validation of Law & Fact
→ Crystallisation of Custom into Common Law
Promise 2
“Cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed…”
Justice sits above governance.
Trial by Jury
Applies conscience to fact and law.
Validation
Tests both factual truth and lawful authority.
Crystallisation
Custom (lex non scripta) becomes formal common law (lex scripta) through jury-affirmed judicial reasoning.
Thus:
Common Law governs customs once crystallised.
Justice mediates governance.
Governance does not sit above Justice.
TIER 4 – GOVERNANCE
Chain:
Promise 1 – Coronation Oath
→ Legislation
→ Corporate Policy
→ Corporate Oligarchy
Promise 1
“Govern according to their [People's] respective laws and customs.”
Governance is conditional upon Tier 2 and Tier 3.
Legislation
Acts, Bills, Statutes.
Corporate Policy
Administrative rule-making.
Corporate Oligarchy
Distortion of governance through corporate interest.
Governance is structurally subordinate to Justice.
TIER 5 – ENFORCEMENT
Chain:
Issuing Lawful Notices
→ Justice Review
→ Jury Validation
→ Enforcement
Enforcement is not autonomous.
It operates only after justice mediation.
Police historically operated under Justice of the Peace authority.
HOW THE MODEL OPERATES DYNAMICALLY
Authority Flow:
Creation
↓
Divine Law
↓
Equal Authority
↓
Consent
↓
Contract
↓
Delegation
↓
Governance
Accountability Flow:
Governance
↑
Justice
↑
Jury
↑
Common Law (crystallised custom)
↑
Conscience
↑
Creation
Equity governs the corrective layer between Common Law and Conscience.
Custom becomes law only when crystallised through Justice.