INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE
DEFINITIONS FIRST = SPEAKING SAME LANGUAGE
My journey started as I wanted to know what is the difference between "LAW" and "LEGAL", and the answer is hidden in plain sight for centuries in current statute law, which today is known as Primary Legislation!
The Confirmation of the Charters 1297
"We will that our Justices, Sheriffs, Mayors, and other Ministers, which under Us have the Laws of our Land to guide, shall allow the said Charters pleaded before them in Judgment in all their points; that is to wit, the Great Charter as the Common Law,"
Law of the Land = The Great Charter = Common Law
THE GREAT CHARTER OF THE LIBERTIES OF ENGLAND, AND OF THE LIBERTIES OF THE FOREST; CONFIRMED BY KING EDWARD, IN THE TWENTY-FIFTH YEAR OF HIS REIGN.
XXIX Imprisonment, &c. contrary to Law. Administration of Justice.
"NO Freeman[equitably person as freeman is a title] shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers[equitably random members of society], or by the Law of the Land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right."
Justice is free!
General Saving. Observance of these Liberties. Subsidy, in respect of this Charter and Charter of the Forest.
"And if any thing be procured by any person contrary to the premises, it shall be had of no force nor effect."
Law of the Land = Great Charter & trial by jury is absolute
Law of the Land = The Great Charter = Common Law = Common Law Precedent at the time determined by trial by jury which is absolute and FREE
The RULES OF EQUITY (conscience - the universal connector of all humanity) prevails over the common law in the event of conflict as decreed in the Earl of Oxford Case 1615, partially legislatively codified in the County Court Act 1984 and the Senior Court Act 1981, where by this admission it binds all lower courts!
Using 'Statutes in Parlyament agreed upon' to govern the people according to their respective laws and customs.
Affirming statutes are subject to the laws and customs of the people = the rules of equity!
created to deal with the succession of the crown and clarify any more misunderstandings in the Bill of Rights 1688 as to the peoples 'ancient customs and liberty, and
- in section IV defines LAW as the PEOPLE’S BIRTH RIGHT (granted by creation), and
- contracts by subjugation those governing to do so according to the same including binding their successors.
Therefore:
TRUTH = CREATION = YOUR BIRTH RIGHT = LAW =THE RULES OF EQUITY which is humanity's best understanding and expression of natural law or the truth which we call a fact evidenced by our observation, and rational application of logic and reason,
which is supreme over
COMMON LAW PRECEDENT = COMMON LAW = LAW OF THE LAND
which is supreme over
ACTS OF PARLIAMENT = PRIMARY LEGISLATION = STATUTES = STATUTE LAW
which is supreme over
SECONDARY LEGISLATION = Regulations = Administrative Law = Municipal Law
Customs = 'normal way of doing something = habit
Convention = a formal meeting of a group of individuals!
CONSTITUTION OF UK
The Constitutional documents are the constituting authority (power to act) of Parliament Assembled, and therefore CANNOT BE REPEALLED by impossibility as they create Parliament Assembled!!!
These documents create the legal authority to govern and constrain the power of what those governing can and cannot do!
Without these documents there are no Houses of Parliament, no Parliament, and no Parliament Assembled!
Uncreating these would remove their authority!!!
Together these documents only grant general authority is as expressed within these documents which are the WRITTEN CONSTITUTION.
The unwritten constitution is where the people have argued details of interpretation in the courts under the rules of equity to create common law precedents = 'BIRTH RIGHT'
By impossibility Parliament Assembled cannot act as it is a fiction of law (a concept, idea), but it acts through its agents, the living people filling the offices and titles, who are bound by law, and hence by impossibility they cannot create new law!
All actions of Parliament Assembled which are unlawful are without authority and hence void being ultra vires...
Any other interpretation is irrational as it defies the fundamental law that "all are equal under the law and no one is above the law.
Further it is accepted that a current Parliament cannot be bound by previous Parliaments - this is obvious as no individual or group of individuals can be bound without their consent.
Hence as all are equal under the law and no one is above the law this rationally means Parliament Assembled cannot bind any other without consent!!!
1 - The Act 1 Will. & Mar. 1688
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/1/1
A group of unincorporated individuals
'natural person' = living man and woman / persons / people / humans or what ever style or title anyone uses to describe them.
The style or title = fiction of law / legal fiction / strawman.
who at the time incorporated themselves into 2 fictions of law known as
The House of lords -Lord Spiritual (Church) and Temporal (used to be Barons and now are a series of titles and styles that MP's ask the Monarch to grant), and
the House of Commons (MP's),
who together are known as the fiction of law known as Parliament.
2 - Bill of Rights 1688
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2
This is a contract (peace treaty) which sets out the structure and authority to govern, and thereby admits GOVERNANCE IS BY CONSENT.
WHY? NO INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS CAN IMPOSE THEIR WILL ON ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS!
Together the fictions of law, the 2 Houses - Lords Spiritual and Temporal = House of Lords) and the House of Commons which make up the fiction of law known as Parliament who together with the fiction of law, the Monarch are created and styled (title) as the fiction of law known as Parliament Assembled.
In its first sentence the creators of this document express the people are the principal over Parliament Assembled as they claim at the time to lawfully represent the people. This may or may not have been true at the time, but in any event means by their own admission they were in agency capacity (only authorised to do what the people expressly by freewill and consent granted them authority to do) and hence the People are 'sovereign' and supreme over those governing by admission. As we, the living were not a party to this contract, it is through this contract still being the source of authority of those governing today and the successors of those governing are contractually bound to this document, but the people who have not individually contracted to be a party of this contract creates a fiduciary obligation on those governing (position of trust to look after your and my interest individually).
In the first 2 articles it then expresses that HM Government is subject to Parliament, and can do nothing without authority of Parliament. This authority is as expressed in Acts of Parliament (Primary legislation) so Parliament is ONLY Sovereign over HM Government!
Further all the people involved in governance (which includes Parliament Assembled, HM Government and their agents) consent by their freewill to uphold the rights and liberties, and agree to the duties and rights expressed in this document.
That is the limit of their authority and hence Parliament being sovereign over people is utter nonsense. No individual can impose their will on any individual or group of individuals because each individual is equal under the law which is self evident!!!
This is the constituting authority of Parliament = The birth right of parliament which is create by people and hence by impossibility cannot have authority greater than its creators!!! It does not, and no constitution could possibly include all possibility and hence only contains general terms, being the intent which is CONTROL TYRANNICAL GOVERNANCE!
3 - Coronation Oath Act
1688 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/1/6
This under the 4 corner rule is part of the Bill of Rights 1688, being the Oath referred to therein. Each promise is an offer to contract with the incoming monarch and expresses their rights and obligations.
The first offer to contract is using the "Statutes in Parliament agreed on" to govern the people according to their "Laws" and "Customs".
Source Authority is the People through their Laws and Customs who are supreme and are sovereign over the Legislative body which is supreme and sovereign over the Executive.
The second offer to contract is that the monarch must create and operate an independent judiciary which is where the people create their public law!
Through the independent judiciary SPECIFIC AUTHORITY is created by individual people settling their disputes creating common law precedent which binds all people to fill in the details which is the UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION s the people acting in the House of Lords and House of Commons are equal under the Law, and therefore by impossibility cannot do anything unlawful!
This is with legal authority as it is within the authority of the constituting authority, and was intended to control the tyrannical actions of the monarchs as expressed in the Bill of Rights 1688 with the people in control of their governance!!!
4 - Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1689
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/2/1
The power of the Bill of Rights 1688 was not fully clarified, and could not possibly include all possibility of governance but establishes the people as the source authority to govern which is through the peoples' agent, Parliament Assembled to control tyrannical governance.
This is a direct attempt for a tyrannical power grab over the people by creating this act and is a breach of contract, and hence treason against the people claiming that Acts of Parliament are "Laws" and "as such ought to be reputed taken and obeyed by all the People" in it's last words!
"That all and singular the Acts made and enacted in the said Parlyament were and are Laws and Statutes of this Kingdome and as such ought to be reputed taken and obeyed by all the People of this Kingdome."
This has no legal authority, and hence is not lawful as this is a breach of the contract to govern, the Bill of Rights 1688 which limits the authority of Parliament and hence is void ab initio (being without lawful authority) depending on the intent of the word 'ought'.
As Parliament Assembled is a fiction of law, and its 'Acts' are created by people, and all are equal under the law, and no one is above the law, under the principle that the intent cannot be unlawful 'ought' can only be interpreted to mean it is suggestive and not binding i.e. Acts of Parliament can only be advice and guidance for the people, who rationally would modify their behaviour if they saw personal benefit = nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people in the Bill of Rights 1688.
Further the Act of Settlement 1700 confirms law as our birth right and hence there can be no dispute that Parliament cannot bind any individual without consent!
5 - The Act of Settlement 1700
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2
In section III Parliament grant the monarch the right of pardon.
In section IV the Laws and Statutes of the Realm are confirmed, and thereby returns Parliament to its lawful and legal authority as expressed in the Bill of Rights 1688.
"And whereas the Laws of England are the Birthright of the People thereof and all the Kings and Queens who shall ascend the Throne of this Realm ought to administer the Government of the same according to the said Laws and all their Officers and Ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same"
Here Parliament Assembled has legally define what law is, confirming that Law = Birth Right, and that those governing do so according to peoples birth right, returning to the authority from the people as expressed in the Bill of Rights 1688 where:
- Under the courts own rules of evidence, until someone can bring ‘creation’ (whatever that may be to anyone) into a court of law to give first hand cross examinable witness testimony, it is self evident that:
- no one is entitled to more than an equal share of the creators creations, and
- All are equal under the law (hence what one can do all can do)[1], and
- No one is above the law (all are accountable for harm they cause)[2], and
- No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other (no one can knowingly harm another).
- No one can knowingly cause the creators creations harm.
- ‘Law’ enforceable can only result from the creation of duties, rights and obligations following a meeting of the minds (= full disclosure of respective party’s duties, rights and obligations) and then by each party’s freewill (= no mental or physical coercion) consenting to the respective duties, rights and obligations.
[1] Common law equality and fairness tort (partially legislatively codified in the Equality Act 2010 and fully codified in the Statute of Monopolies 1623
[2] Equity will not suffer a wrong without a remedy. Lord Mansfield in Montefiori v Montefiori (1762) affirms 'no man shall set up his own iniquity as a defence, any more than as a cause of action' https://ssudl.solent.ac.uk/id/eprint/1313/1/2007_11_1&2.pdf
As a fiction of law cannot act by impossibility as it has no being, it can only act through its actors, and as those actors are people and all are equal under the law and no one is above the law is perfectly in line with these self evident truths!!!
6 - Union of Scotland Act 1706
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/6/11
The authority for this is derived from the Bill of Rights 1688 and the Declaration of Rights (Scotland) 1689
This creates the United Kingdom of Great Britain (merging the authority of England and Wales (Britain) with Scotland) with Parliamentary supremacy in Westminster for all said nations styled Parliament of Great Britain, additionally constraining the authority of those governing to ensure the peoples self evident right to:
IV "full Freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation to and from any port or place within the said United Kingdom", and
XVI coinage parity, and
XXV That laws incompatible with this treaty are void, and
I am not going at the moment into Ireland and the break up which resulted in what we have now, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland... for another day!
MORE EVIDENCE - IN BLACK AND WHITE
Confirmation From National Archives
Confirmation From Cabinet Office
