GLOBAL100 – UNIVERSAL JUDGMENT-PDF ARCHIVE

SUPERSEDED CONTROLLED VERSION

This page preserves G100 v1.00 as the previous controlled universal judgment-archive baseline.

It was superseded for active universal use by G100 v1.01 on 21 July 2026 at 1400 BST.

Current universal judgment archive:

https://peacekeepers.org.uk/g100-judgments/

The historical body and legacy links below remain preserved. Any wording within the preserved body describing G100 v1.00 as “current”, “live” or “active” records its status before supersession.

Historical inclusion does not establish a proposition of law, ratio, binding principle, quotation, later treatment, application or Bundle Approved status.

Web revision token: G100-v1.00-HIST-20260721T1421-BST

Page code: G100

Controlled title: Global100 – Universal Judgment-PDF Archive

Subtitle: Canonical judicial-decision source library

Current controlled baseline: G100 v1.00

Governed by: MLSP v1.01A at G000

Status: live controlled migration baseline

URL: https://peacekeepers.org.uk/judgments-2/

1. PURPOSE

G100 is the universal source archive for canonical copies of judgments, tribunal decisions and approved transcripts used across PeaceKeepers litigation-control projects.

G100 preserves the judicial decision document. It does not decide what the decision means, approve a proposition, verify a quotation or substitute for the primary official source. Proposition, ratio, limitation and pinpoint control belongs in G200 and in the relevant case-specific C30 page.

Every G100 entry must remain traceable to its original source, source status, document type, verification state and any duplicate or companion copies.

2. PAGE BOUNDARY

Page	Function	What does not belong there
G000	Universal methodology, templates, modules and research architecture.	Judgment archive files except worked examples expressly classified as examples.
G100	Canonical judicial-decision files: judgments, approved transcripts, tribunal decisions and limited companion records.	Statutes, rules, pleadings, skeletons, submissions, blogs, commentary, guidance, academic papers, forms or unsupported summaries.
G200	Universal propositions of law, ratio/obiter classification, quotations, pinpoints, limits and verification status.	Duplicate source files presented as if proposition verification.
C20	Case-specific evidence and source documents, including case orders, pleadings and local judgment copies not yet promoted to G100.	Universal proposition approval.
C30	Case-selected authority propositions, verification and bundle status.	Uncontrolled raw archive dump.

3. ACCEPTED G100 DOCUMENT TYPES

Type code	Accepted document	Control
JUDGMENT	Official or court-approved written judgment.	Preferred canonical source.
APPROVED-TRANSCRIPT	Approved transcript of oral judgment or reasons.	Canonical where no written judgment exists or the approved transcript is the decision record.
TRIBUNAL-DECISION	Official tribunal determination or decision.	Must identify tribunal, members, date and status.
LAW-REPORT	Authoritative report or scan where no official judgment is available, especially historical authorities.	Report citation and provenance required.
COMPANION-ORDER	Order inseparably linked to a judgment and needed to understand disposition.	Companion only; not a substitute for reasons.
COMPANION-SUMMARY	Official press summary or official case summary.	Companion only; never the canonical proposition source.
FOREIGN-JUDGMENT	Foreign judicial decision retained for comparative or persuasive use.	Jurisdiction must be explicit; never presented as binding English authority.

4. EXCLUDED OR QUARANTINED MATERIAL

Legislation, statutory instruments, rules, practice directions and government guidance: link and proposition control belongs in G200.
Pleadings, witness statements, skeleton arguments, submissions, orders without reasons, correspondence and evidence: retain on the relevant C20 page.
Blogs, Wikipedia pages, articles, textbooks, practitioner notes, academic papers and advocacy analyses: secondary material; not G100 judgments.
Law Commission papers, parliamentary briefings, historical source documents and administrative forms: preserve elsewhere and link from G200 where relevant.
Unapproved transcripts, unattributed OCR, incomplete scans and files whose provenance cannot be established: quarantine until verified.
Duplicate copies: preserve in storage but designate one canonical public link and record all duplicates against the same G100 ID.

5. SOURCE-STATUS LADDER

Status	Meaning	Use
S1 – OFFICIAL	Judiciary, National Archives, court or tribunal official source.	Preferred.
S2 – APPROVED	Judge-approved transcript or approved judgment supplied through an authorised transcription route.	Canonical where appropriate.
S3 – AUTHORITATIVE REPORT	ICLR or another authoritative law report / verified historical report.	Canonical where no official decision file exists.
S4 – RELIABLE ARCHIVE	BAILII or another reliable archive reproduction whose identity is confirmed.	Usable subject to verification and source preference.
S5 – SECONDARY COPY	Readable reproduction, OCR or third-party copy without complete provenance.	Research only; replace before final filing where possible.
Q – QUARANTINE	Identity, completeness, approval or provenance unresolved.	Not cited as canonical and not promoted to G200 as verified.

6. G100 ID AND FILENAME STANDARD

Every canonical decision receives one stable human-readable identifier in the register: G100-J0001, G100-J0002 and so on. The ID does not change when a better copy is obtained.

The filename begins with the page code and stable decision ID. Fields are separated by underscores. Short-case-name words may be joined by hyphens. Do not insert advocacy propositions, conclusions or commentary into filenames.

G100_J0001_2019_UKSC_38_Cape-v-Dring_JUDGMENT_OFFICIAL.pdf
G100_J0002_2023_EWHC_2355-KB_Leighton-v-Bristow-and-Sutor_APPROVED-TRANSCRIPT_APPROVED.pdf
G100_J0003_1765_KB_Entick-v-Carrington_LAW-REPORT_AUTHORITATIVE.pdf
G100_J0001_C01_2019_UKSC_38_Cape-v-Dring_COMPANION-SUMMARY_OFFICIAL.pdf
G100_J0001_D01_2019_UKSC_38_Cape-v-Dring_DUPLICATE-RETAINED.pdf

7. CANONICAL RECORD REQUIREMENTS

Stable G100 ID.
Neutral case title without advocacy annotation.
Neutral citation and report citation where available.
Court or tribunal, jurisdiction, decision date and judicial decision-maker.
Document type and source-status code.
Canonical filename and preserved parent/original filename.
Official source URL and PeaceKeepers media URL.
SHA-256 hash, page count, searchability/OCR status and completeness note.
Duplicate group, companion files, replacement history and supersession status.
Related G200 proposition IDs and case-specific C30 links.
Verification status and responsible reviewer.

8. RELATIONSHIP WITH G200

G100 answers: What is the canonical judicial decision file?

G200 answers: What proposition, ratio, quotation, pinpoint and limitation has been verified from that decision?

No G100 filename or link label should state an argumentative proposition such as “void orders”, “no supremacy”, “fatal flaw” or “extortion”. Those descriptions must be removed from the archive title and, if legally supportable, tested and recorded neutrally in G200.

9. PUBLIC ARCHIVE INDEX FORMAT

The public archive should be organised by jurisdiction and court, then by year. Each row should show the G100 ID, neutral case title, citation, decision date, document type, source status and canonical download link.

The public page may retain a searchable legacy section during migration, but it must be clearly labelled as unverified and non-canonical.

G100 ID	Case / decision	Citation	Court	Date	Type	Status	Download
G100-J____	[Neutral case title]	[Neutral/report citation]	[Court]	YYYY-MM-DD	[Type]	[S1-S5/Q]	PDF

10. LEGACY ARCHIVE MIGRATION STATUS

The pre-control archive contains more than 400 links in a flat list. It includes duplicates, non-judgment materials, inconsistent titles, proposition commentary, multiple source qualities and some external webpages rather than judgment PDFs.

No existing source file is to be deleted, overwritten or silently renamed. During migration, retain the current list under the heading “Legacy archive index – under controlled migration”. Assign G100 IDs progressively, upload canonical copies alongside parent files, update the public canonical index and record the migration delta.

An entry remains legacy or quarantined until the canonical source, title, citation, document type, status and duplicate relationship are confirmed.

11. MIGRATION ORDER

Freeze destructive changes: preserve all current media and links.
Import each legacy title and URL into the G100 Judgment File Register.
Classify: canonical candidate, duplicate, companion, non-G100 transfer, quarantine or broken link.
Verify case identity, court, citation, date, source provenance and completeness.
Select the best canonical copy under the source-status ladder.
Assign the stable G100 ID and create the new G100-coded filename as a new file.
Record parent filename, duplicate group, SHA-256 and replacement history.
Update the public canonical table and cross-link any verified propositions in G200.
Only after link testing, remove the old public duplicate link from the legacy display; retain the underlying source file.
Complete the G100 verification record and cache check.

12. CONTRIBUTION AND INTAKE

Requests for a missing judgment should identify, so far as possible, the case name, court, citation, decision date and reason the decision is required.

A submitted file is not automatically canonical. It enters the intake register and remains unverified until its identity, provenance, completeness and status are checked.

Personal data, reporting restrictions and publication restrictions must be reviewed before public upload.

13. CONTROL DOWNLOADS

File	Purpose
MLSP_G100_CORE_00_Full_Universal_Judgment_Archive_Control_Pack_v1.00	Complete G100 control pack.
MLSP_G100_CORE_01_Archive_Readme_v1.00	Start-here guide.
MLSP_G100_CORE_02_Universal_Judgment_Archive_Control_Protocol_v1.00	Full archive governance, intake, naming, source-status and migration protocol.
MLSP_G100_TEMPLATE_01_Judgment_File_Register_v1.00	Canonical archive and migration register.
MLSP_G100_TEMPLATE_02_Judgment_Intake_Form_v1.00	Single-decision intake and verification form.

14. UNIVERSAL CROSS-LINKS

Code	Page	URL
G000	Universal MLSP methodology	https://peacekeepers.org.uk/mslp-universal/
G100	Universal judgment-PDF archive	https://peacekeepers.org.uk/judgments-2/
G200	Universal propositions of law / pinpoint register	https://peacekeepers.org.uk/mslp-propositions-of-law/

15. LEGACY ARCHIVE INDEX – UNDER CONTROLLED MIGRATION

The existing linked archive is retained below until each item has been
classified and migrated. Legacy inclusion is not verification of identity,
completeness, authority status, proposition or pinpoint.

[1956] Lazarus Estates Ltd v Beasley [1956] 1 QB 702 [1956] Lazarus Estates Ltd v Beasley [1956] 1 QB 702 pdf [1953] Wiseman v Wiseman 1 All ER 601 [1953] Wiseman v Wiseman 1 All ER 601 readable [1949] R v Sherman Ltd 2 KB 674 [1934] Elle Street Estates Ltd v Minister for Health 1 K.B. 590 [1925] Roberts v Hopwood [1925] AC 578 [1890] Dixon v. Wells 25 Q.B.D. 249 [1879] R v Hughes (Owen) 4 Q.B.D. 614 [1703] Ashby v White (1703) 92 ER 126 [1986] R v Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police, ex parte Calveley EWCA [1982] UKHL R v Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Hill; R v Dartford Justices, ex parte Dhesi; R v Edmonton Justices, ex parte Hughes [1982] Shah, R (on the application of) v Barnet London Borough Council [1982] UKHL 14 [1982] Shah v LBC of Barnett UKHL 14 [1981] Q.B. DC R v Gateshead Justices Ex p Tesco Stores Ltd [1979] R v West London Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex p Klahn [1979] 1 WLR 933 [1975] Q.B. 455 R v. BRENTFORD JUSTICES, Ex parte CATLIN [1973] Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] UKHL AC 273 [1973] 1 W.L.R. 19.pdf [1970] The Justices Clerks Rules
[2012] EWHC 3801 (Admin) R Banfield v Harrow Magistrates’ Court [2015] UKSC 21 R (Evans) v Attorney General – Parliament attempted exemption for ministers to overule judiciary FOI and EIR [2017] EWHC 3042 (Admin) The Queen on the Application of Gazi Khan v Feltham Magistrates’ Court v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hounslow [2018] EWHC 17 (Admin) – at 13 final notice section 33 – Woolcock, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2019] D, R. v (Rev 1) [2019] EWCA Crim 209 – No duty to notify resident for CT [2019] Miller v The Prime Minister judgment UKSC [2019] 41 PROROGATION JUDGMENT [2019] UKSC 22 R (on the application of Privacy International) (Appelant) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2020] UKSC 23 Defamation claim Serafin (Respondent) v Malkiewicz and others (Appellants) [2024] EWCA Civ 66 Judgment-SSHD-v-IAB-CA-2023-002298 [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin) National-Council-for-Civil-Liberties-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department-judgment 1610 Case of Proclamations – formated 1610 Dr Bonhams Case – IRRATIONALITY 1670 Bushell’s Case Tampering with jury including by judges [1996] R v Derwentside Magistrates Court Ex p Heaviside RTR 384 [1997] R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson Parliament must legislate according to law [1999] Sunworld Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2000] QB [2001] R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKHL 26 [2001] The Director of Public Prosecutions v Grant [2001] EWHC 1114 (Admin) [2002] English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd. [2002] EWCA Civ 605 JUDICIAL REASONING [2010] NA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKUT 444 1980 Pao On v Lau Yiu Long AC 614 1987-Felixstowe-R-v-Felixstowe-Justices-ex-parte-Leigh-and-another-1987-1-All-ER-551 2002 Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2002] EWCA Civ 1871 2008 London_Borough_of_Newham,_R_on_the_application_of_v_Stratford_Magistrates EWHC 125 (Admin) Set aside civil order s142 2009 Ferguson v British Gas Trading Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 46 (10 February 2009) 2010 UKUT = High Court 444 at 11 to 15 FATAL FLAW 2012 ABQB 571 (CanLII) _ Meads v. Meads _ CanLII THE ATTEMPT TO DEFEAT PROOF MY OBLIGATION 2012 Simmons-v-castle EWCA Civ 1039 2017 R Gazi Khan v Feltham Magistrates’ Court [2017] EWHA 3042 (Admin) COSTS IN MAGISTRTES COURT 2017 UKSC 5 R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 2018 Asadi VT00005865_Decision 2019 UKSC 38 Cape Intermediate Holdings v Dring 2023 Leighton v Bristow & Sutor Cardiff HCJ J90SA002 2301025-2022 Jab case 1670 Case of William Penn and William Mead 1880 OSBORNE TO ROWLETT 13 Ch.D. 774 1943 Craig V Kanssen [1943] K.B. 256. VOID ORDERS 1962 Close v Steel Company of Wales Ltd AC 367 1963 Re Pritchard, decd.; Pritchard v Deacon 1978 Pearlman v Keepers and Governors of Harrow School 3 WLR 736