TRUSTEE RESOLUTIONS

PeaceKeepers Trustee Resolution: PK – GDPR - 2026- 02

Resolution date: 01/02/2026

Trustee Resignations, Governance Records, GDPR and Trust-Based Transparency

Former Trustees concerned: Hugh Goggin and Brian Reece

WHEREAS

1. Resignations
   The PeaceKeepers Foundation received written notices of resignation from Hugh Goggin and Brian Reece, each resigning from their roles as trustees, and the cessation of trusteeship was recorded accordingly.
2. Nature of the Foundation’s Role
   The Board recognises that the PeaceKeepers Foundation is not itself the trust, but acts as the holder and administrator of funds and assets subject to trust-based obligations, including public educational and supporting materials and platforms created and relied upon prior to incorporation.
3. Trust-Affected Resources
   Prior to incorporation, the PeaceKeepers website, YouTube channels, and associated supporting materials were:
   • presented as community educational and supporting resources governed by stated objectives, ethos, and posting guidelines;
   • relied upon by participants and contributors as evidence-based learning tools; and
   • developed through collective contribution, feedback, moderation, and reliance for the benefit of the whole.

The Board determines that these circumstances give rise to constructive and voluntary-association trust-like obligations, requiring that such resources be administered consistently with their stated purpose and with transparency to beneficiaries.

1. Fiduciary Duty of Disclosure
   In holding and administering those trust-affected resources, the Board has a fiduciary duty to ensure:
   • accuracy of governance records;
   • transparency as to responsibility and authority; and
   • non-misrepresentation to beneficiaries, funders, and participants.
2. Pre-Resignation Trustee Discussions
   Prior to their resignations, both Hugh Goggin and Brian Reece participated in discussion within the PeaceKeepers trustee Telegram group, raising concerns relating to organisational direction and governance while acting in their capacities as trustees.
3. Post-Resignation Conduct (Hugh Goggin)
   Following his resignation, Hugh Goggin continued to express and advance those concerns within the PeaceKeepers public Telegram group and the NOCNOC Telegram group, linking those concerns to his resignation.
4. Post-Resignation Conduct (Brian Reece)
   Following his resignation, Brian Reece did not participate in the PeaceKeepers or NOCNOC Telegram groups, but issued a public resignation statement in video form via a YouTube channel previously used to publish PeaceKeepers educational and other materials, whose subscriber audience had been established while that channel was operated in connection with PeaceKeepers which he repurposes for his personal new “Genesis Trust” project.
5. Continuity of Audience and Platform Guidance
   The post-resignation communications by each former trustee were conveyed to audiences established through PeaceKeepers platforms and activities and were used to assert a fundamental philosophical divergence and to characterise the Foundation’s direction as involving dangerous consequences.
6. Subsequent Platform Linking (Brian Reece)
   On or about 12 January 2026, Brian Reece placed a hyperlink to a new PeaceKeepers YouTube channel on the home page of the former PeaceKeepers You tube channel which Brian Reece repurposed for his new “Genesis Trust” project, and subsequently removed that hyperlink from the home page, such that access thereafter required viewers to navigate through and select individual videos.
7. Risk of Misunderstanding
   The combination of trustee-level discussions, post-resignation public communications, continuity of audience, and changes in platform presentation created a foreseeable risk of misunderstanding among beneficiaries, funders, and participants as to governance, continuity of purpose, and stewardship of trust-affected educational and supporting resources and public pledges.
8. Statement of Facts
   The Board caused a Statement of Facts and governance chronology to be compiled and published, setting out the factual sequence of events supported by primary source materials.
9. Initial Opportunity to Be Heard
   In accordance with principles of natural justice and procedural fairness, both Hugh Goggin and Brian Reece were invited to:
   • review the Statement of Facts;
   • identify any alleged factual inaccuracy; and
   • submit evidence-based objections supported by primary evidence,

with any such objections and supporting evidence to be linked and published alongside the Statement of Facts.

1. Response from Hugh Goggin
   Hugh Goggin responded with “No Comment” and did not identify any factual inaccuracy or submit supporting evidence.
2. Response from Brian Reece
   Brian Reece responded but did not provide any clarification or correction identifying factual inaccuracy.
3. Further Opportunity to Correct the Record
   Prior to the meeting of the remaining trustees, and in the interests of fairness and completeness, a further opportunity was afforded to both Hugh Goggin and Brian Reece to provide any concise clarification or correction limited to factual accuracy, within a specified time.
4. Expiry of Opportunity to correct the Record
   No further response was received.
5. Consideration of GDPR Obligations
   The Board considered its obligations under the Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR, including Articles 5, 6, and 17, having regard to accuracy, fairness, transparency, necessity, and proportionality.

IT WAS RESOLVED THAT

1. Accuracy of Governance Record
   The Statement of Facts and associated governance chronology constitute an accurate record of trustee resignations and related governance events, subject only to correction of any proven factual inaccuracy supported by evidence.
2. Publication of Resignation Records
   The resignation correspondence and factual chronologies shall remain published as part of the Foundation’s historical governance record relating to trust-affected educational and supporting resources.
3. Purpose of Publication
   Publication is for the purpose of:
   • maintaining accuracy and transparency;
   • preventing misrepresentation to beneficiaries and participants; and
   • discharging fiduciary duties of disclosure in respect of trust-affected resources.
4. No Endorsement or Adjudication of Belief
   No endorsement, commentary, or inference is made regarding the personal beliefs, motives, or character of either former trustee.
5. Data Protection Compliance
   The Board determines that continued publication of the governance record is lawful and proportionate under the Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR, and that the right to erasure does not apply where publication is necessary for accuracy, transparency, and the proper administration of trust-affected resources considering the repurposing of the previous PeaceKeepers Youtube channel and threats of litigation received.
6. Completion of Due Process
   Having afforded both former trustees a reasonable and proportionate opportunity to identify factual inaccuracies, and no such inaccuracies having been substantiated, the Board records that the due-process stage relating to factual correction is complete.
7. Future Corrections
   Nothing in this Resolution prevents correction of the governance record should any specific, evidenced factual inaccuracy be identified in future.

CONFIRMATION

This resolution reflects the determination of the Board following due process and is adopted to ensure lawful governance, trust-based transparency, and informed understanding by beneficiaries.

Signed on behalf of the Board

Djon Perrotte, Lance Peatling and Marc Horn

Date: 1 February 2026